DNTP study shows that zebrafish screening protocols affect toxicity outcomes
A quantitative assessment of sources of variability in the design of zebrafish experiments could set the groundwork for global efforts to harmonize protocols, according to researchers from the NIEHS Division of the National Toxicology Program (DNTP).
Zebrafish embryos have been widely used as toxicity screening tools due to advantages such as transparency and rapid development. But data obtained from independent laboratories can vary vastly, complicating the use of zebrafish screening for regulatory decisions.
To investigate this issue, DNTP researchers analyzed zebrafish toxicity data from three independent laboratories using the same set of 87 compounds. They estimated the concentrations that elicited death, developmental toxicity, and impairment of movement responses.
For laboratories that used similar assay protocol parameters, the concordance reached as high as 86% for developmental toxicity results and as high as 68% for neurological toxicity results. By contrast, the concordance dropped for laboratories that used different protocol parameters. Strikingly, the concentration required to produce developmental and neurological toxicity ranged, on average, up to four-fold and six-fold, respectively.
Factors that potentially contributed to this variability included the fish strain, whether the outermost membrane surrounding the embryo had been removed, the exposure scenario and volume, and behavioral testing time. According to the authors, the findings may guide ongoing efforts to incorporate zebrafish as a complementary model for drug development and toxicity testing.
Citation: Hsieh JH, Behl M, Parham F, Ryan K. 2022. Exploring the influence of experimental design on toxicity outcomes in zebrafish embryo tests. Toxicol Sci; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfac053 [Online 27 May 2022].