Low-dose mixtures and cancer highlighted at NIEHS symposium
By Virginia Guidry
Scientists gathered at NIEHS Aug. 25 to consider how exposures to low doses of chemical mixtures may contribute to the development of cancer. The Halifax Project: Low Dose Theory Symposium was organized to discuss next steps, following publication of a special issue of the journal Carcinogenesis, which was written by a group of scientists known as the Halifax Project Task Force.
The name Halifax Project refers to a 2013 meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia, that was supported by the NIEHS Superfund Research Program. At the meeting, 170 researchers from a variety of scientific disciplines discussed the potential of low doses of chemical mixtures to cause changes that lead to cancer.
“We are happy to have NIEHS eyes on the project,” said Leroy Lowe, co-founder and president of Getting to Know Cancer, the organization that coordinated the Halifax Project , “because we are quite interested to hear from so many cancer biologists about how they think biology might inform risk assessment and toxicology.”
“There are several questions about how to define low dose, determine the most relevant windows of susceptibility, and investigate exposures to mixtures,” said Linda Birnbaum, Ph.D., director of NIEHS and the National Toxicology Program (NTP). “One thing we know is that the toxicology of the 21st century should not be that of the 20 th century.”
Low-dose theory applied to cancer
As Lowe and other speakers emphasized, much of the research on the contribution of environmental exposures to cancer has emphasized carcinogens, which are single chemicals that are shown to lead to cancer. However, because cancer development is often a long, involved process, there may be opportunities for multiple chemicals to play independent roles, each contributing to the final disease state. Chemicals may either promote cancer or interfere with mechanisms in the body that correct abnormalities in cells (see sidebar).
For the Halifax Project, scientists reviewed literature for evidence that chemicals might be able to act together to promote cancer, even though the chemicals may be considered noncancer-causing and the public may be exposed at low levels.
In the papers they wrote for the Carcinogenesis issue, the researchers presented 85 environmental chemicals that may act on key pathways, to result in one of 11 hallmarks, or phenotypes, of cancer. Over half of those chemicals exerted effects at levels similar to levels the general population is commonly exposed to. The scientists proposed that by acting on different pathways, these chemicals may produce a cumulative effect that leads to cancer.
Next steps for testing the hypothesis
The NIEHS symposium served as the next step toward developing a hypothesis. Researchers from government, academia, industry, and nongovernmental organizations, as well as the Halifax Project attended the meeting. Lowe and William Goodson III, M.D., who served as first author of the lead paper in Carcinogenesis, provided background on the Halifax Project and the implications of the findings. Attendees then broke into three roundtable discussions on emerging research needs.
- Information gaps regarding the theory of how low-dose mixtures contribute to carcinogenesis.
- Key research methodologies that would enable the testing of this hypothesis.
- Potential implications of low-dose mixture theory on policy and decision-making, as well as the potential for influence on disease endpoints besides cancer.
“The next stages of this project concern whether we can translate what we see as a problem into science that demonstrates that it is an issue,” said Lowe.
Transdisciplinary cooperation is key
Participants agreed that an important next step is to generate data to test the low-dose mixtures theory. “You’ve got a theory saying that low doses to environmental chemicals somehow are working together to increase cancer,” said Richard Peffer, Ph.D., senior toxicologist at Syngenta. “If that was the case, there should be some experimental data pointing to that.”
Participants emphasized that transdisciplinary conversations are essential to future research. “The epidemiologists, toxicologists, biologists, and oncologists all need to be talking to industry, and there needs to be a back and forth,” said Goodson. “The stakeholders here are not the doctors and industry. The stakeholders are our children, our grandchildren, and our great-grandchildren, and whatever we do now is going to change their lives. It behooves us to try to do it right.”
(Virginia Guidry, Ph.D., is a technical writer and public information specialist in the NIEHS Office of Communications and Public Liaison.)