Researchers rise to the challenge of studying mixtures
By Virginia Guidry
Real-world chemical exposures occur in mixtures, yet researchers typically study exposures to single chemicals, due to analytical limitations. NIEHS invited scientists from across the country to a workshop July 13-14, to evaluate new statistical methods for studying exposures to mixtures of chemicals in the environment.
Statistical Approaches for Assessing Health Effects of Environmental Chemical Mixtures in Epidemiology Studies brought together epidemiologists, biostatisticians, toxicologists, and exposure scientists eager to tackle the topic.
The need to study mixtures
Studies of mixtures are tricky because of the need for complicated measurements, the difficulty of determining which components are of concern, and the lack of well-established statistical methods. “It is imperative that the study of environmental mixtures be driven by our research questions and not by the statistical tools at our disposal,” said Joseph Braun, Ph.D. , of Brown University during his opening talk.
“Times have changed dramatically with our computing power and our understanding of the environment and the complexities of exposure,” said Gwen Collman, Ph.D., director of Extramural Research and Training at NIEHS. She added that scientists need to use emerging tools to better understand how the web of environmental exposures may contribute to a host of health endpoints.
Meeting the challenge
NIEHS organized the workshop around a challenge to researchers. Last year, a planning committee, led by Danielle Carlin, Ph.D., of NIEHS, invited scientists to analyze three epidemiological data sets and submit abstracts describing their approaches and results. More than 30 abstracts were submitted and displayed in the poster session. The committee selected 20 of them for workshop presentations.
Two of the data sets the committee provided contained simulated data, generated by meeting planners so that the analyses would be more straightforward and the results easier to compare. The third data set came from the Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment (HOME) study, based at the Cincinnati Environmental Health Center and funded in large part by NIEHS.
Attendees shared solutions using a variety of statistical methods (see sidebar), and lively discussion characterized the event. Veronica Vieira, D.Sc. , from the University of California, Irvine, echoed the enthusiasm many attendees expressed about the opportunity to compare approaches. “[It’s great] to see so many different methods applied to the same data sets, because replication is a big deal,” she said.
The organizers commended participants for the time they spent analyzing data for the challenge. “When you consider that the environmental health community was willing to put hundreds of person-hours into this, that response says something about the field,” said Braun, as he reflected with fellow planning team member Russ Hauser, M.D., Sc.D. , of Harvard University. Organizers also celebrated the involvement of both junior and senior scientists in the workshop.
Continuing development of statistical methods
The meeting served as an important springboard for determining how to analyze chemical mixtures in epidemiological studies. “I strongly support the use of more challenges like this to move the field forward,” said Gaurav Pandey, Ph.D. , from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. He has seen similar meetings fuel advances in genomics and computational biology.
According to Carlin, the event highlighted the need for more data sets to be made available, so researchers can conduct comparisons and refine their statistical methods.
Several participants recommended keeping focused on public health research questions as new statistical methods emerge. Others emphasized the need to match statistical methods with the research questions they are best suited to answer.
Hauser reminded scientists to generate results that are useful to policymakers, a goal that may be more complicated with analysis of mixtures. “We have to remember when we publish our results, whether on mixtures or individual chemicals, ultimately, they will be used by risk assessors to protect public health,” he said.
Carlin said the organizers will prepare a report and commentary on the workshop.
(Virginia Guidry, Ph.D., is a technical writer and public information specialist in the NIEHS Office of Communications and Public Liaison.)